|Genre||Criticism (230 pp.)|
|Keywords||Communication, Doctor-Patient Relationship, History of Science, Humor and Illness/Disability, Ordinary Life, Power Relations, Psychiatry, Psychosomatic Medicine, Scapegoating, Science, Suffering|
|Summary|| The book is split into three parts, the Analytic Part, the Synthetic Part and the Theoretical Part. The Analytic Part begins with an excellent synopsis of earlier theories of comedy, joking and wit, followed by a meticulous psychological taxonomy of jokes based on such features as wordplay, brevity, and double meanings, richly illustrated with examples. This section ends with Freud's famous distinction about the "tendencies" of a joke, in which he attempts to separate those jokes that have tendencies towards hidden meanings or with a specific hidden or partly hidden purpose, from the "abstract" or "non-tendentious" jokes, which are completely innocuous. He struggles to provide any examples of the latter. In the midst of his first example, he suddenly admits that he begins "to doubt whether I am right in claiming that this is an un-tendentious joke"(89) and his next example is a joke that he claims is non-tendentious, but which he elsewhere studies quite intensely for its tendencies. Freud uses this to springboard into an exploration of how a joke involves an arrangement of people - a joketeller, an audience/listener, and a butt, often involving two (the jokester and the listener) against one, who is often a scapegoat. He describes how jokes may be sexual, "stripping" that person, and then turns towards how jokes package hostility or cynicism.|
The synthetic part is an attempt to bring together the structure of the joke and the pleasurable tendencies of the joke. Why is it that jokes are pleasurable? Freud's answer is that there is a pleasure to be obtained from the saving of psychic energy: dangerous feelings of hostility, aggression, cynicism or sexuality are expressed, bypassing the internal and external censors, and thus enjoyed. He considers other possible sources of pleasure, including recognition, remembering, appreciating topicality, relief from tension, and the pleasures of nonsense and of play. Then, in a move that would either baffle his critics or is ignored by them, Freud turns to jokes as a "social process", recognizing that jokes may say more about social life at a particular time than about particular people; he turns this into an investigation of why people joke together, expanding on his economical psychic perspectives with discussions of social cohesion and social aggression.
In the third part, Freud connects his theories of joking with his dream theories in order to explain some of the more baffling aspects of joking (including how jokes seem to come from nowhere; how we usually get the joke so very quickly, even when it expresses very complicated social phenomena; and why we get a particular type of pleasure from an act of communication). He ends with an examination of some of these themes in other varieties of the comic, such as physical comedy and caricature.
|Commentary|| This book is one of Freud's more accessible forays into culture and the psychologies of social life, with less investment in the psychoanalytic process as a form of therapy than some of his other books, and fewer discussions of doctor-patient relationships; but such topics are never far from his mind. What do we learn about people from the jokes they tell? Why do we joke? Why does laughter seem involuntary? Why is something so common and universal so difficult to explain? These are some of the questions Freud tackles. His idea that jokes package a tremendous amount of hostility was not new nor was the idea that joking is an emotional catharsis (and Freud duly acknowledges his sources). But, in a structuralist move par excellence, he explores how the semantic forms of joking relate to psychological forms: the brevity, the word play, the grammatical and semantic relations.|
It is unfortunate that critics of Freud so rarely offer as considered an account of his work as the one he offers of general theories of comedy at the outset of Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. The first few pages are a concise, astute, and accurate synopsis of the theories of comedy. Some of his own ideas, such as the way he maps economies onto our psyche, may seem awkward, but they are worth considering and this is one book where his novel ideas about comedy are, if not impossible to prove or disprove, also worth considering. Freud proposes a number of theoretical approaches to understanding jokes and wit, built up around the idea that joking is not just about laughter replacing anxiety and fear but is also a way of expressing unconscious thoughts related to maturity, social control, sexuality and aggression in daily life, all of which takes place in a public and social milieu.
His work very much bridges older theories of joking, such as a Hobbesian superiority or catharsis, with social and anthropological theories, such as Henri Bergson's or Mary Douglas's. Those who offer a synopsis of Freud's thinking about jokes based on one theory - e.g., that he thinks that jokes emerge from an unconscious aggression as a way of bypassing the internal censor - have not familiarized themselves with the many different approaches Freud takes in this book, and the way in which he openly struggles with the nebulous terrain of comedy and how science might approach this psychological, social, cognitive and cultural phenomenon.
|Place Published||New York|
|Miscellaneous||First published in 1905 as Der Witz und seine Beziehung zum Unbewussten (Lepzig: Deuticke)|
|Annotated by||Henderson, Schuyler W.|
|Date of Entry||03/20/08|